How the Hell Do the Warmists Keep All the Lies Straight?

Is anyone else getting tired of these Global Warming cheerleaders (i.e. Warmists) covering both sides of the argument?  We're traipsing into cartoon territory here.  Here's the latest:

Experts: Global warming means more Antarctic ice
 

Yeah...that's the headline by Seth  Borenstein of the Associated Press.  Here's the problem.  The Antarctic produces an all time record in September for ice.  This is a problem (even admitted in the linked article) so a response is required less the Warmists lose more of their followers.  So, out comes the word of "experts" stating that the increase in ice in the Antarctic actually confirms global warming. 

However, how do they explain the IPCC (United Nations answer to climate omnipotence) citing this article in their reports on global warming:

Sea Ice Evolution Over the 20th and 21st Centuries
 

Specifically stated and accepted by the IPCC and Warmists everywhere (when it served their purpose) was this:

The climate change projections over the 21st century reveal that the annual mean sea ice extent decreases at similar rates in both hemispheres...

That's right there in the abstract of their cited paper.  And yet, now the poles are opposites.  How convenient.

PS:  Not that it's important or anything, but the Antarctic holds over 90% of the world's ice.