About those Op/Ed's without an Author

I've reached the point where every time I see an Opinion Editorial where no author is identified, I immediately jump to the conclusion that an entity who holds the same agenda as that media outlet's leanings (predominately Left) wrote the talking points, and leave it to the newspaper to fit it into an article.  Sometimes, I think the entity seeking baptism writes the whole thing in total.

That's what I see when I read the nonsense USA Today tried to feed us today in reference to President Obama's Second Term Agenda.   Read this paragraph, and if you're honest, you will see no less than three (3) out and out lies with absolutely no contradiction of truth by the "Editorial Board" since they are allegedly writing the Op/Ed.

The document is slick, well-presented — and largely besides the point. Obama has always had an agenda, one that Democrats cheer and Republicans fear. It starts with trying to boost the economy while striking a deal to rein in future deficits, in part by raising taxes on the wealthy. It involves preserving his signature accomplishment, ObamaCare, through its full launch in 2014. And it also includes bringing troops home from Afghanistan, preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, enacting immigration reform, and trying to rekindle interest in combating climate change.
 

Not once in this praising article of Obama's Second Term Agenda did the "Editorial Board" ask the most important of questions.

WHY DOES A SITTING PRESIDENT HAVE TO ISSUE A SECOND TERM AGENDA?

The answer is quite simple.  It is thus:

BECAUSE THE NITWIT SCREWED THE POOCH IN THE FIRST TERM.